payments for ecosystem services

Understanding the effects of China’s agro-environmental policies on rural households’ labor and land allocation with a spatially explicit agent-based model

Role of social networks in building household livelihood resilience under payments for ecosystem services programs in a poor rural community in China

Divergent social-ecological outcomes of payments for ecosystem services

Related publications reforestaion policy, labor migration, and forest dynamics (Zhang et al. 2020)

Interaction between land use change and labor migration under forest conservation

Effects of payments for ecosystem services programs in China on rural household labor allocation and land use: Identifying complex pathways

Divergent socioeconomic-ecological outcomes of China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: subtropical mountain vs. loess plateau

This article contributes to the Special Issue “Mountain landscapes: protected areas, ecosystem services and future challenges” edited by Uta Schirpke, Genxu Wang, and Emilio Padoa-Schioppa The Editorial of the special issue on summary is provided in Ecosystem Services.

Rural household income distribution and inequality in China: Effects of payments for ecosystem services

Effects of payment for ecosystem services and agricultural subsidy programs on rural household land use decisions in China: Synergy or trade-off?

Determinants of out-migration in rural China: effects of payments for ecosystem services

In this article, we study the impacts of the two payments for ecosystem services (PES) programs on individual out-migration decisions. PES programs: Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) Ecological Welfare Forest Program (EWFP) The research is highlighted in research news hosted by the Population Dynamics Research Centers

Impacts of China’s grain for green program on migration and household income